May 14, 2009 Han Honggang times weekly Die Zeit reporter from Beijing before May 7, Huang Xiaojun blood disease of the medical profession is only ringing the characters, he is known for treating blood diseases blood disease, Peking University People's Hospital Research Institute. The day after, he became a 8 blood diseases and stem cell transplantation experts held a joint press conference, alleged that Huang Xiaojun declared a large number of false data, reverse time deception. but this is by virtue of Huang Xiaojun agencies involved in the investigation and make decisions, in the opinion of the participation of a variety of speculation over the place, the event also from a purely academic counterfeiting incident became public view of reason and credibility of the Government's public events. confused speculation the incident exposed the border, the unexpected is, Dao-Pei Lu became the first person to be questioned. no shortage of commentators have suggested that exposure disciples Dao-Pei Lu academic misconduct is of interest because of personal grudges or disputes, and questioned the act out of solidarity, Air Force General Hospital and General Hospital, the hospital is now part-time training in the road. In this regard, Dao-Pei Lu of Die Zeit, told reporters that he indeed had a conflict with Huang Xiaojun, but this event requires serious debate is the fact that the truth of scientific misconduct Huang Xiaojun problem, the truth of right and wrong, not something else. Several other experts were also told reporters on Die Zeit, the reason involved, is based on a true understanding of themselves and the future of the academic medical community concerns. for Dao-Pei Lu Station out of the main reasons, began in 1986 at Peking University People's Hospital Research Institute of Hematology, 2003 Road to Beijing after the training hospital of the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation expert Wu Tong told reporters on Die Zeit: to join the clinical and research academic achievements, before he had taught 10 times at home and abroad, and now hijacked by Huang Xiaojun top prize in medicine was awarded, which is equivalent to the identification of intellectual property ownership. This is how the issue of personal grievances, infringe your intellectual property, you do not stand out. academic fraud, the outcome is not occupied, it is the key question as to transfer the conflict of interest, which is good or bad relationship, Zheng Depan other children are two different things. If done well in all aspects Huang Xiaojun, it can also prove Dao-Pei Lu Well framed. people do, often only the most informed them. we should not expose persons to manage holding what kind of motivation, but by his revelation is true. on whether there is sufficient basis to expose those who expose what motives, should be careful investigation dealt with severely. Council Standing Committee on the first discovered. Then he called five hospitals in emergency 9 experts Huang Xiaojun Awards in materials and papers in-depth and comprehensive investigation, after the formation of a written report presented to the leadership of the Chinese Medical Association to seek clarification on the facts and Award by the Chinese Medical Association to revoke the award regulations. Chinese Medical Association instructs the recommended award, Peking University People's Hospital unit mm verification issue. People's Hospital, then to find Dao-Pei Lu, the names of the land promised to add a second top award in the complete people, Dao-Pei Lu overall situation and put people in hospitals requires a horse, and to keep the Institute of Hematology, Huang Xiaojun put the name of a horse. In this regard, time Weekly reporter Wang Shan Hospital to verify the people, but Wang Shan No reply. In the December 30, 2008 response letter to the Chinese Medical Association, the Beijing University People's Hospital said Die Zeit reporter Hanhong Gang from Beijing before May 7, Huang Xiaojun blood disease of the medical profession is only ringing the characters, he is known for treating blood diseases blood disease, Peking University People's Hospital Research Institute. The day after, he became a name of Experts held a joint press conference, alleged that Huang Xiaojun declared means. and Huang Xiaojun It is with this the participation of public opinion, all kinds of speculation over the place, the event also from a purely academic counterfeiting incident became public view of reason and credibility of the Government's public events. confused speculation the incident exposed the border, the surprise is Dao-Pei Lu became the first to be challenged people. no shortage of commentators have suggested that exposure disciples Dao-Pei Lu academic misconduct is of interest because of personal grudges or disputes, and questioned the Because eight experts, Tongchun Rong, Fang, Wu Tong, Zhangyao Chen, Dong Lujia, high Zhiyong 6 from Beijing and Shanghai Road training hospital, up to million were from the Ming and Jishu Quan and Air Force General Hospital of PLA General Hospital, now Hospital part-time training in the road. In this regard, Dao-Pei Lu of Die Zeit, told reporters that he indeed had a conflict with Huang Xiaojun, but this event requires serious debate is academic misconduct Huang Xiaojun genuine issue of fact, truth, right and wrong, and not something else. Several other experts were also told reporters on Die Zeit, the reason involved, is based on a true understanding of themselves and the future of the academic medical community concerns. come out of the main reasons for Dao-Pei Lu, 1986 Start the Institute of Hematology, Peking University People's Hospital to work in Beijing after the 2003 Hospital Road, Pei hematopoietic stem cell transplantation expert Wu Tong told reporters on Die Zeit: He previously taught at home and abroad over 10 times, and now hijacked by Huang Xiaojun top prize in medicine was awarded, which is equivalent to the identification of intellectual property ownership. This is how the issue of personal grudges, infringe your intellectual property, you To not stand up. This is the key question as to transfer the conflict of interest, which is good or bad relationship, Zheng Depan other children are two different things. If done well in all aspects Huang Xiaojun, it can also prove Dao-Pei Lu framed citizenship. deviation from the border as part of the focus of speculation and confusion, a senior the most informed. we should not expose persons to manage holding what kind of motivation, but by his revelations are true. on whether there is sufficient basis to expose those who expose what motives, should be seriously investigated, dealt with severely. He then called five hospitals in emergency 9 experts Huang Xiaojun Awards in materials and related papers in-depth and comprehensive investigation, after the formation of a written report presented to the leadership of the Chinese Medical Association to seek clarification on the facts, according to the Chinese Medicine Ordinance will be reward revoke the award. instructed the Chinese Medical Association recommended award, Peking University People's Hospital verification unit mm matter. People's Hospital, then to find Dao-Pei Lu, to the name of promised land added to the second rank among the completion of the award, the overall situation requires Dao-Pei Lu put people in the hospital for a horse, and to keep the Institute of Hematology, Huang Xiaojun put the name of a horse. In this regard, time Weekly reporter Wang Shan Hospital to verify the people, but Wang Shan No reply. In the December 30, 2008 to reply to the letter of Chinese Medicine, Peking University People's Hospital said figure, he is known for treating blood diseases, Peking University People's Hospital Hematology Institute. And one day, he became a experts who have expressed their views do not want to wait for policy arrangements. this issue, Chinese Medical Association Secretary General Wu Mingjiang to the media, said: to the specific situation. Please experts in the field of blood. experts will not say, but I can say that we stand up to any department of the review. third-party survey, Wu Mingjiang, said: Chinese Medical Association's treatment is extremely serious, very wrong with this: bit real name insiders report should be taken seriously. . . Meanwhile, in the assessment, scientific research should specifically look at the substance and quality, and not just look at the surface of the article, only know a few number of papers. Cheng Nan said: how to make it clear what the white. academic circles inside should choose a mutually acceptable third party investigation team, which is has to do. such a big thing, you can let the matter rest? very worried about it Gangs of academic. This is a milestone event, but also the prestige of the Government to rebuild, or to come to a crossroads opposite opinion. If nothing, it hurt the whole medical profession and academia in China, and even the government and the credibility of the country. blood diseases and stem cell transplantation experts held a joint press conference, alleged that Huang Xiaojun declared data, reverse time deception. and Huang Xiaojun It is with this policy arrangements. this issue, Chinese Medical Association Secretary General Wu Mingjiang to the media, said: Ming Jiang, he again expressed the same view and stressed: that matter, but I can say that we stand up to any department of the review. , very wrong with this: . reform should be to change the official position of the system, do not let the awards, capital allocation, job promotion and other assessments do not understand the power of the line lies in the hands of administrative officials, but should be judged by a professional group. Meanwhile, in the assessment, you should specifically look at the substance and quality of research work, and not just look at the surface of the article, only know a few number of papers. Cheng Nan said: select a mutually acceptable third party investigation team, which is has to do. such a big thing, can do nothing? previously been exposed, like the vast majority of fraud incidents, and finally to nothing. Government to rebuild the prestige of public opinion or to come across a crossroads. If nothing, it hurt the whole medical profession and academia in China, and even the credibility of the government and the country. Buick, Jane has also contributed to this article
Yuting disclosed the incident, due to the relative silence of one party Huang Xiaojun, there is no third-party certification bodies involved in the investigation and make decisions, in the opinion of the participation of a variety of speculation over the place, the event also from a purely academic crackdown events into the public view of reason and credibility of the Government's public events.
confuse speculation for the border Technology Award first prize. In this regard, Dao-Pei Lu very dissatisfied, so continue to look for evidence. Spring Festival, MD, Tao Pei Fang gradually took over the hospital physician Huang Xiaojun paper on the collation and comparison work. Fang said Huang Xiaojun in Chinese Medical Science and Technology Award attached application of the 31 papers, the clinical part of the review can not, only 16 research papers were compared. Fang found that 14 of 20 multiple false papers, including the forged sample size, Tampering with data, invented data, copied from another data. Fang told reporters: n = 11, or n = 12, but got exactly the same mean and standard deviation, which is impossible in science, is clearly false. Peking University Health Science Academic Committee and the joint meeting of Academic Ethics Committee, the prosecutor and the prosecutor were all present statements, Huang Xiaojun response was, and his doctoral students are not familiar with statistical software as a result of the use of a . According to Dao-Pei Lu introduce and show evidence that the request to meet with him that evening Huang Xiaojun concurrent threat of mobile phone text messages, said: in evidence against you. phone, or no answer, or Huang Xiaojun landline phone to play again, he unexpectedly received a call back. journalists and interviews show that the intent of identity, the Huang Xiaojun, said: Threads on a , plagiarism, infringe upon the academic achievements of others, and place a number of major fraud, behavior is obvious, it is easy to identify. As to whether he hijacked the results of others, need to see a lot of information can be found, I do not have this condition. University School of Medicine in response to the Chinese Medical Association, said: plagiarism and other issues of academic achievements of others is difficult to make a clear conclusion. Huang Xiaojun, etc. of Chinese Medical Science and Technology Award won the first prize award department dealing with opinions and suggestions by the decision. Institute for many years, now training in the Road, director of the hospital as immunotherapy Tong Chunrong physicians expressed strong dissatisfaction: there has also continued to award controversial, really difficult to understand. At this time, Tong Chunrong out his eyes with tears, sob. She followed Dao-Pei Lu for many years that she worked for Dao-Pei Lu is the best doctor than the hospital. Dao-Pei Lu development of events to today's situation is also difficult to understand, he said, to open news will be out of frustration, investigation, more ridiculous is that people actually Awards and prizes by the report recommended to evaluate the report is true unit. , so, this is the real interests. After the incident exposed bit
, surprisingly, Dao-Pei Lu became the first person to be questioned. no shortage of commentators have suggested that exposure disciples Dao-Pei Lu academic misconduct is of interest because of personal grudges or disputes, and questioned the and Dao-Pei Lu experts may have made the existence of conflict of interest act of solidarity to reach out and Jishu Quan million were from the Air Force General Hospital of PLA General Hospital, the hospital is now part-time training in the road.
Hematology Branch of the experts who have expressed their views do not want to wait for policy arrangements. this problem, Chinese Medical Association Secretary General Wu Mingjiang to the media, said: point of view and stressed: We stand up to any department of the review. significant organizational structure to further improve the system's problems. now you are basically all sectors, including media organizations are not all that thing. in the awards process, as long as someone submitted doubt the authenticity of the results, you should do first and then decide whether to award survey. In particular, the real name is a number of insiders to report, but should be taken seriously. also expressed a clear view of the opposition: system, do not let awards, capital allocation, job promotion and other assessments do not understand the power of the line lies in the hands of administrative officials, but should be judged by a professional group. Meanwhile, in the assessment, scientific research should specifically look at the substance and quality, and Do not just look at the surface of the article, only know a few number of papers. Cheng Nan said: tripartite investigation team, which is has to do. such a big thing, you can let the matter rest? fake events, the last is nothing. walked across an intersection of public opinion. If nothing, it hurt the whole medical profession and academia in China, and even the credibility of the government and the country. contribution
this, Dao-Pei Lu told reporters on Die Zeit that he had indeed conflict with Huang Xiaojun, but this event requires serious debate is academic misconduct Huang Xiaojun genuine issue of fact, truth, right and wrong, not the other thing. Several other experts were also told reporters on Die Zeit, the reason involved, is based on a true understanding of themselves and the future of the academic medical community concerns.
come out of the main reasons for Dao-Pei Lu, 1986 Peking University People's Hospital began in the work of the Institute of Hematology, 2003 Road to Beijing after the training hospital of the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation expert Wu Tong told reporters on Die Zeit: previously he taught at home and abroad over 10 times, and now hijacked by Huang Xiaojun top prize in medicine was awarded, which is equivalent to the identification of intellectual property ownership. This is how the issue of personal grudges, infringe your intellectual property rights, Do you want to come out. the results are not occupied, it is the key to the transfer as contradictory interests, which is good or bad relationship, Zheng Depan other children are two different things. If done well in all aspects Huang Xiaojun, it can also prove Dao-Pei Lu framed citizenship. ;
as MD, Tao Pei Fang gradually took over the hospital physician Huang Xiaojun paper on the collation and comparison work. Fang said Huang Xiaojun Chinese Medical Science and Technology Award in the application of the 31 papers in the annexed, the clinical part of the review can not only 16 research papers were compared. Fang found that 14 of 20 multiple false papers, including the forged sample size, tampering with data, invented data, copied from another data. Fang told reporters: very professional, give an example that it is easy to understand. For example, in a different paper, the number of mice or n = 5, or n = 11, or n = 12, but got exactly the same mean and standard deviation, It is not possible in science, is clearly false. statements, Huang Xiaojun response was, his doctoral students are not familiar with statistical software as a result of the use of a : is the The visits Peking University People's Hospital Hematology rushed, but he did not in the list of experts visits the evening of January 12 .5, Huang Xiaojun press play again to landline phones, he unexpectedly received a call back. reporters to identify themselves and interviews intent, the Huang Xiaojun, said: Description of prize evidence. Fang said: large amounts of data can be found, I do not have this condition. evidence, but there the data is incorrect, unclear labeling, form irregularities. According to materials provided by the two sides, others on the informer's academic achievements and other issues of plagiarism difficult to make definite conclusions. Huang Xiaojun, etc. of Chinese Medical Science and Technology Award by the the first prize award department dealing with opinions and suggestions by the decision. dissatisfaction: IMPACT is so difficult, not to mention most people do. Now he stepped down, no one in charge of. too snobbish! many hospitals have worked the best doctor. Dao-Pei Lu development of events to today's situation is also difficult to understand, to open news conference, he said out of frustration, The application materials is by far the master of academic fraud. However, there is no organized from start to finish an independent third party to investigate the matter objectively, it is actually ridiculous and awards by the Awards in person to evaluate the report recommends whether the unit false. million out of Die Zeit, told reporters that he suggested Hematology Branch investigation team of experts to form. In this connection, a number of times weekly
reporter called off for the opinion part of the focus of speculation and confusion border, a senior fighters motives, but by his revelations are true. on whether there is sufficient basis to expose those who expose what motive, should be seriously investigated, dealt with severely. 14 Die Zeit Die Zeit reporter Hanhong Gang from Beijing before May 7, Huang Xiaojun blood disease of the medical profession is only ringing the characters, he is known for treating blood diseases blood disease, Peking University People's Hospital Research Institute. The day after He became a and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation experts held a joint press conference, alleged that Huang Xiaojun declared reverse time deception. but this is by virtue of Huang Xiaojun judge, in the opinion of the participation of a variety of speculation over the place, the event also from a purely academic counterfeiting incident became public view of reason and credibility of the Government's public events. confused speculation the incident exposed the border, the surprise is, Dao-Pei Lu became the first person to be questioned. no shortage of commentators have suggested that exposure disciples Dao-Pei Lu academic misconduct is of interest because of personal grudges or disputes, and questioned the
No comments:
Post a Comment